Twitter has changed their terms of service to explicitly allow for pedophile-type content to be shared on their platform. Henceforth I shall be referring to them as Shitter because frankly, that’s what they are.
The new terms of service explicitly states, “Discussions related to child sexual exploitation as a phenomenon or attraction towards minors are permitted.”
The new rule adds vague disclaimers that such pedophile content is allowed “provided they don’t promote or glorify child sexual exploitation in any way.”
Twitter has stated it will allow for nude depictions of children on their platform as long as it is “artistic.”
“Artistic depictions of nude minors in a non-sexualized context or setting may be permitted in a limited number of scenarios e.g., works by internationally renowned artists that feature minors,” states Twitter’s new terms of service.
Dr. James Cantor, ‘an advocate for pedophiles’ or as I prefer to call him, a worthless sack of shit, refers to pedos as “Minor-Attracted Persons” – MAPs
Last year he was part of a tribe of sickos, who sent a letter urging Twitter to allow pedophiles to discuss their attraction to children openly.
Cantor was one of many ‘academics’ that refer to themselves as “Virtuous Pedophiles” and asked that they be allowed to network on Twitter.
Let’s just take a minute to reflect on that. Academics – responsible for the care of children and young minds are demanding to be allowed to share their experiences and fantasies publicly. Have we as a society really sunk that low as to normalise the corruption of children?
He claims that if these so-called virtuous pedophiles aren’t allowed to network on Twitter, they will sexually abuse children.
Then they aren’t very fucking Virtuous are they? They just haven’t had the opportunity YET.
“In our professional opinions, terminating the accounts of non-offending, anti-contact Minor Attracted Persons (MAPS) is likely to result in the opposite effect of that which Twitter may expect or intend. Rather than reducing the incidence of child sexual abuse, if anything, it increases the risk that some pedophiles will be unable to obtain the peer or professional support that they may need in order to avoid offending behavior. It is also likely to increase the stigma and isolation associated with pedophilia and thereby increase the likelihood of some MAPs acting on their sexual feelings,” stated the letter.
Professional Opinions? Their professional opinion is that if they can’t share pedophilia publicly then they’re going to assault children. It’s a ‘professional’ opinion though so that’s okay.
Any time photos of children are shared by those that consider them object is of sexual gratification it is child abuse.
There. That’s my opinion and it’s ‘professional’ in that I didn’t swear.
I cannot offer any support or understanding to ‘peers’ who consider children worthy of sexual attention.
There is a stigma associated with pedophilia for a very good reason. We, as adults are supposed to protect and nurture children, not defile them.
I have deleted my twitter account. I’m done. I will not be a part of a service that not only tacitly allows but is now normalising such behaviors. As a mother and now a grandmother, I’ve always been afraid for my children’s safety. I cannot, in conscience, accept this so I’ve chosen to make my feelings loud and proud.